Home Forums Gamescan Chat42 About
* Login   * Register * FAQ    * Search
It is currently Fri 07-25-2025 9:44AM

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 247 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 17  Next

Should the name be changed?
No, we aren't SMSU, we have a reputation that far exceeds our name, and that is what is important. 81%  81%  [ 109 ]
Yes I am sissy, and the name of my school is what matters, not the degree. 18%  18%  [ 24 ]
Total votes : 133
Author Message
 Post subject: UMR Name Change
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 4:50PM 
Offline
Lieutenant General
User avatar

Joined: Mon 11-17-2003 12:27AM
Posts: 3128
Location: The Bat Cave

Source: Off Campus
edit

_________________
Carney Institute of Technology

Why not outlaw MURDER instead of trying to outlaw guns?


Last edited by jthxv on Tue 10-24-2006 12:56PM, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 4:57PM 
Offline
Major General
User avatar

Joined: Mon 09-05-2005 9:23PM
Posts: 2128

Source: Fidelity
This is a joke. I can stand the no schools thing (I wrote a big ass article for the Miner about that this week, read up), but renaming is just absurd.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 5:02PM 
Offline
Colonel
User avatar

Joined: Sun 09-12-2004 8:22PM
Posts: 657
Location: somewhere

Source: Off Campus
I think if we change the name, we should change back to Missouri School of Mines. Otherwise, who gives a shit?

_________________
if you woke up as me everyday, you'd hate yourself too.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 5:05PM 
Offline
Major General
User avatar

Joined: Thu 09-25-2003 8:14PM
Posts: 2314

Source: Fidelity
Name change? You mean this?

http://www.news-leader.com/springfield/ ... hasey.html


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject: Re: UMR Name Change
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 5:05PM 
Offline
Colonel
User avatar

Joined: Fri 08-20-2004 9:39PM
Posts: 576
Location: Rolla

Source: Nagogami
jthxv wrote:
Comment removed at the request of the author.


I think you worded your question sufficiently biased enough to get the results you want, BUT I agree with the concept.

WTF is the chancellor thinking? Leave our F'ing name alone!

What is the new proposed name?

Wait I know!!!

Carney Technical Institute (CTI)

-jsn

_________________
Invention, my dear friends, is 93 percent perspiration, six percent electricity, four percent evaporation and two percent butterscotch ripple.

UMR - R.I.P. 04/06/07


Last edited by Shadow Priest on Tue 10-24-2006 1:13PM, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 5:09PM 
Offline
Spanish
User avatar

Joined: Wed 08-21-2002 10:10AM
Posts: 1898
Location: A-Frames bitches!

Source: Off Campus
Is this a hoax or something? Who would honestly let this happen?

_________________
KOK - 011, Pullin rank on bitches since 2005


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 5:09PM 
Offline
Captain

Joined: Thu 07-29-2004 9:08AM
Posts: 138
Location: Rolla

Source: Off Campus
For those of you that are wondering what brought this about....

http://news.umr.edu/news/2006/NameChange06.html


Quote:
I think if we change the name, we should change back to Missouri School of Mines. Otherwise, who gives a shit?


I agree!!


Also if I remember correctly, when SMSU changed their name, there was a time limit on that issue.
That is why CMSU recently agreed on changing their name. I believe the time limit is August of next year and needs to be brought up now, in order to be voted on by students, faculty and board members.

Link to CMSU thing. Interestingly Can't find it in the archives of any online newspapers .
http://www.cmsu.edu/x92810.xml

_________________
Glen


Last edited by glbbrown on Mon 10-09-2006 6:55PM, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 6:10PM 
Offline
bertowned
bertowned
User avatar

Joined: Sun 08-20-2006 4:26PM
Posts: 2118

Source: TJ North
if anything - BTMSU - Better Than MSU

i think we all know that the UM schools are all at least a tier above the MU schools.

edit: by UM being better i dont mean the name is better i mean the schools are better. the name doesn't matter so much, but i don't want to see UMR change. MSM, (as said below) is about the only thing i could tolerate.

_________________
BigPeeOn wrote:
Here's the deal: chemistry is the devil.
Anything beyond balancing an chemical equation is black magic.


Last edited by amd2800barton on Mon 10-09-2006 6:17PM, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 6:13PM 
Offline
Brigadier General
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08-17-2004 3:04PM
Posts: 1671
Location: GBH

Source: VPN
MSM would be about the only name change I could stomach, and I doubt that'll ever happen, as we can't scare away potential students......anyone who chooses a school on the name sounding cool and not on the program shouldn't even be in college......

_________________
The solution of this problem is trivial and is left as an exercise for the reader.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 6:21PM 
Offline
Major General
User avatar

Joined: Thu 09-25-2003 8:14PM
Posts: 2314

Source: Fidelity
I'm against it. I'm betting he wants to change it to "Missouri Tech", or some other derrivative of that...which would give us the same initials as Michigan Tech and Montana Tech.

Also, I noticed in that article that he wanted to bring UMR up to one of the top 10 technological research universities by 2010. US News & World Report currently ranks UMR #68 for our graduate engineering program, in general. We'll have quite a hard time trying to raise our rankings by 50 places in 4 years. Also, with the chancellor's other plan to increase UMR's student population by 2,000 students in 2 years, I'm beginning to think the man is insane.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 6:26PM 
Offline
bertowned
bertowned
User avatar

Joined: Sun 08-20-2006 4:26PM
Posts: 2118

Source: TJ North
it does explain how some people made it in.

_________________
BigPeeOn wrote:
Here's the deal: chemistry is the devil.
Anything beyond balancing an chemical equation is black magic.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject: Re: UMR Name Change
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 6:27PM 
Offline
Lieutenant General
User avatar

Joined: Mon 11-17-2003 12:27AM
Posts: 3128
Location: The Bat Cave

Source: Off Campus
Jason Holm wrote:
I think you worded your question sufficiently biased enough to get the results you want


Why should I poll differently than most of the polling companies?

_________________
Carney Institute of Technology

Why not outlaw MURDER instead of trying to outlaw guns?


Last edited by jthxv on Tue 10-24-2006 1:00PM, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile E-mail  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 6:32PM 
Offline
Admiral Fgt of the SS Queer
User avatar

Joined: Sun 08-15-2004 10:37AM
Posts: 2408

Source: MST Wireless
No polling companies include answers that insult the person making that choice.

_________________
"Jesus is never mad at us if we live with him in our hearts!"
"I hate to break it to you, but he is--he most definitely is."
The word "bi-partisan" usually means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out.


Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 6:34PM 
Offline
bertowned
bertowned
User avatar

Joined: Sun 08-20-2006 4:26PM
Posts: 2118

Source: TJ North
jthvx wrote:
Why should I poll differently than most of the polling companies?

because conservatives try to eliminate bias and liberals bitch no matter what.

seriously. when have you ever heard a poll quoted with the question
"Are you for or against terrorsit insurgency in Iraq?" (a conservatively biased question)
but i would say it is common to hear a similairly worded quesiton as
"Do the anarchists [What CAIR calls the terrorists they so love]/does the opposition deserve a voice in the Iraqi government?" (a question smiled upon by those who like Ted Kennedy and his bastard cronies)

_________________
BigPeeOn wrote:
Here's the deal: chemistry is the devil.
Anything beyond balancing an chemical equation is black magic.


Last edited by amd2800barton on Tue 10-10-2006 3:24AM, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
    
 Post subject: Had to post
PostPosted: Mon 10-09-2006 6:38PM 
Offline
Private

Joined: Mon 10-09-2006 6:27PM
Posts: 1

Source: Fidelity
This is my first post ever but I had to post about this topic. I really don't understand the need. UMR has a strong reputation and is nationally known as a very strong "technological" school. Apparently Carney thinks the name change will help people understand more fully what we aspire to be which is a leading technological university. It seems like we already have this distinction though so why waste an ass load of money getting this new name out. Plus the proposed names make us sound like a vo-tech school. The only names I've heard mentioned seriously by Carney are Missouri Technological Institiute and Missouri Institute of Technology or some other derivative that includes the word University.
I guess the real question is does anyone actually think this change won't go through? Every time Carney throws out one of his ideas for everyone to ponder it seems like he's already made up his mind. Based on that fact I think we'll have a new name in under six months.


Top
 Profile  
    
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 247 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group