On all of my computers that I've run Linux on, I've gone with a Debian based system, so I've gotten used to apt. My company (and Uncle Sam) use Red Hat. Is this really the way that rpm does packaging?:
1) Find an rpm of what you want.
2) Try to install it, rpm reports missing dependencies.
3) For each dependency, start at step 1.
It's so asinine that I'm almost sure I'm doing something wrong. With apt, I just say "sudo apt-get install <packagename>" and it (usually) installs everything I need.
Is there an easier way to use rpm? And yes, I've got an rpm for apt, but, surprise, surprise, it's got about 6 missing dependencies.
Joined: Sun 08-18-2002 10:33AM Posts: 751 Location: Kansas City, KS
Source: Off Campus
I think yum does dependancy tracking for Red Hat-based systems.
_________________ It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
It is by the beans of Java the thoughts acquire speed,
the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
I highly suggest yum. With RPMs I think you pretty much have to solve dependencies yourself.
_________________ I have a cheese-shredder, which is its positive name. They don't call it by its negative name, cause no one would buy it: sponge-ruiner. Because I wanted to clean it, and now I have little bits of sponge that would melt easily over tortilla chips.
one time, I found the RPM called apt -a port from debian. I was so impressed that I downloaded it right away not knowing that you have to install...one bajillion other RPMs.
_________________ It seems the white trash of the internet has arrived. http://rsaxvc.net
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
